Proper Classification of Inspection Programs vs. Equipment in FAI
Published .
Related
- AS9100
Topics
- fai
- as9102
- tooling
- cmm
- inspection
- metrology
- software
A supplier submitted a First Article Inspection (FAI) package for a complex machined part. The supplier listed the Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) used for inspection on their list of inspection equipment. However, they did not separately identify the unique, part-specific program used to run the inspection routine.
The prime contractor's quality review identified a gap in the FAI documentation. While the CMM machine itself is standard measuring equipment, the part-specific CMM program is considered 'Designed Tooling' under AS9102 because it is uniquely created to validate design characteristics.
Key Takeaways
- The FAI report was rejected and returned to the supplier for correction.
- This required the supplier to update Form 3 to include the unique identifier, revision, and location of the CMM inspection program, delaying the FAI approval.
- The prime contractor's quality review identified a gap in the FAI documentation.
Common Mistakes
- Missing balloon numbers on the drawing.
- Title block requirements not accounted for on Form 3.
Best Practice
Organizations must differentiate between universal measuring equipment and part-specific software or programs used to control it. Part-specific inspection programs are considered 'Designed Tooling' per AS9102 and must be documented with unique identifiers in the FAI report.
Reflects the recommended position based on community discussion and expert review.
Continue the conversation
Have a different interpretation or recent experience that adds nuance? The community keeps lessons sharp.
Ask LINK
Get an instant AS9102-grounded answer from our FAI assistant. The fastest path to a working answer for your own situation.