Install the FAIRQA app
Faster access from your home screen.
Industry Lesson

Ensuring Accurate and Complete Data on AS9102 Form 1

Published .

Applicable Standards

AS9102

Applicable Sections

  • Form 1 — Part Number Accountability
  • Form 2 — Product Accountability

Related

  • AS9100

Topics

  • fai
  • as9102
  • form-1
  • documentation
  • data-integrity
  • rejection
  • bill-of-materials
Scenario

A supplier submitted a First Article Inspection (FAI) package for a multi-component assembly to their customer for approval. The package was compiled by a quality engineer who followed the assembly's bill of materials to populate the FAI forms. The intent was to demonstrate that all manufacturing and assembly processes were capable of producing conforming articles.

Issue

The customer rejected the FAI package due to incorrect data placement and justification on Form 1. Raw materials and special process specifications were listed as part numbers on Form 1, rather than on Form 2, and the reason selected for the FAI did not align with the actual trigger event required by AS9102.

Key Takeaways

  • The rejection required the supplier to expend additional resources to completely rework the FAI package, leading to delays in product acceptance.
  • The supplier had to re-categorize all items, moving material and process data to the correct forms and providing objective evidence for the new FAI reason.
  • The customer rejected the FAI package due to incorrect data placement and justification on Form 1.

Common Mistakes

  • The customer rejected the FAI package due to incorrect data placement and justification on Form 1.
  • Incorrect or incomplete Form 1 part number traceability.

Best Practice

Organizations must use AS9102 Form 1 exclusively as the top-level index for deliverable hardware, including detail parts, sub-assemblies, and standard catalog items. The 'Reason for FAI' must be carefully selected to match the specific trigger event, as errors on Form 1 can invalidate the entire FAI package and demonstrate a weak understanding of the standard.

Reflects the recommended position based on community discussion and expert review.

Continue the conversation

Have a different interpretation or recent experience that adds nuance? The community keeps lessons sharp.

Ask LINK

Get an instant AS9102-grounded answer from our FAI assistant. The fastest path to a working answer for your own situation.